Eyes shut. Alarm. Eyes open. Snooze. Get up. Coffee, cigarette, morning paper, freeway, go to work, come home, dinner, movie night, Eyes shut. In the world of suburbia it is finding meaning in the mundane that distinguishes one day from the next. The lather-rinse-repeat cycle that brings comfort, also allows for growth on the daily level. When the seemingly repetitive nature of life is broken down and the stereotypes are re-evaluated, you are left with what is still real in the suburbs: People, humanity, and other Carbon based life forms.
Once you get past whatever side of the binary fence you are sitting on: “an oppressive, repressive, passive boring upper-class prison” versus “the best case scenario of the American dream: progress, development, and the picket fence,” then you are able to extract meaning from suburban life. Suburbia is more than a spot on the map, or a geographical location, the word itself carries connotations that are often applied (or projected) onto it’s inhabitants. It has become a spot of contention for those questioning the ethicacy of the lifestyle: a robotic rat race of a unified “vanilla” dream, the place where heterogeneity is replaced by homogeneity, where difference is leveled out by the bulldozer of peer policing, and meticulous attention to formula has allowed for the “one shopping center” theory of architectural ambition. The other side is that it is idyllic, a veritable paradise for the masses, where equality (albeit by virtue of rather strict cultural policing) allows for a peaceful existence without the feeling of inadequacy. A little side note: what has become problematic recently for the last theory is the “marketability” of the suburbs. Places like Orange County are distinguishing themselves as “la crème de la crème” of the suburbs, and slowly adding layers the suburban class system. For lack of a better word, they are considered “the suburban elite” and shows like Laguna Beach focus on making them appeal to national/international audiences the same way a city would…but I digress.
Let’s be honest, from the outside all of our days aren’t going to look that different. We’re probably all doing variations of a pretty short list of activities. That isn’t the point. The point is that what is routine becomes a clean slate from which people can find meaning, actively. By questioning, and wondering if you really do look ridiculous from outer space (read: alien perspective) when you are on the treadmill, freeway, or in the symmetrical tract home that is your neighborhood. The goal is to keep breaking down the stereotypes until what has meaning is placed back into the individual’s subjective hands, and to make “different” a word that doesn’t always imply judgment or power relationships.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
I like the point you make about how everyone's life is some variation of routine and repetition. After so much discussing about the seeming mechanization of everyday suburban life and how this can potentionally lead to an empty or meaningless life (i.e. Waldie perhaps?), I'm starting to believe that we've projected our dissatisfaction with a common problem of life onto the suburbs. Is it because people in the suburbs grow complacent with this routinization, despite the fact they may have the means to break free? As it seems many suburbanites have a pretty hefty nest egg or monetary cushion, should they be using it to do new things, rather then keep it in some savings account in a bank? While I've had my own share of issues with the "bubble" I grew up in, I'm also incredibly grateful for it. I'm starting to think we're giving the suburbs a bad reputation, and I'm not sure if its because the suburbs seems to be the final resting ground for ones hopes and ambitions or maybe something more?
You make a good point that now there seems to be a class system within the suburban class. The experience of the "O.C." image people at the top is not necessarily representative of the traditional Waldie suburb (and everything in between). I disagree with the idea that someone would have a more meaningful life if they did not live in the suburbs. We all have pretty much the same routine day to day, so does a more diverse (possibly more dangerous) environment make one person's routine more valid? Is the issue really that suburbanites can go through their lives pretending that social problems on a grander scale do not exist? People do not just become robots. other than that I have no answers.
Ooh! This very much reminds me of the book "Linden Hills" by Gloria Naylor that I had to read in high school, especially the bit about Orange county portraying itself as the creme de la creme of suburbia. Linden Hills is a book all about a suburb just like that, which through the course of the book goes from being a useless piece of land to being a status symbol neighborhood for those who live there, with a stratification of the community resembling the circles of hell in Dante's inferno. Everybody there was desperate to be at the center, but nobody really understood why. Linden Hills is definitely an overall negative view of suburbia, but it ends on a positive "overcoming evil" note. I don't know if Orange County will end like that though- I don't live there and I've never watched the show.
I think that your finger is way off the pulse, but your hook is nice. The suburbs have cultivated my soul.
I liked that you included an awareness of the binary quality of feelings about the suburbs and I think that we need to be aware of this and work past it because it is far more complex than utopia/dystopia.
Jessica Benjestorf,
This is unrelated to your blog. Please visit my Family History website www.Roddy.net and follow link to "Benjestorf Family" and/or please contact me.
cousin Don Roddy
son of Lucille Benjestorf
Post a Comment